rhetorical question about marriage

A rhetorical question is a question whose purpose is to add creative flair to your writing. Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?” Romans 6:1 ANSWER: “God forbid. Their replacing the garment of marriage, their vows of love and devotion to their wives, with acts of social abuse and emotional and even physical violence, God hated as well. These questions are perfect for a road trip. When “hate” is used in contrast to “love” in passages, as it is in Malachi 1, it has the sense of “reject” and love would have the sense of “choose.” But when the word is used separately, as it is in this particular passage, it adds the idea of “to detest, abhor” to the rejection. Marriage is not a piece of paper, wedding, or ring. For official apologetics resources please visit. This example is from Hamlet and it says “To be or not to be, that is the question… Xper 1. The word has a use in Job that illustrates the meaning. The scenario offered is that there are no witnesses, hence my opinion that there can be no valid marriage. But a curse from the prophet was warning enough that if such sin was persisted in it would bring the penalty. Try these road trip questions for couples too. Be on your guard against such treachery. If reconciliation was possible, it was to be pursued; if not, then the people had to accept responsibility for their acts, find forgiveness and healing from God, and get on with their lives--like any other person forgiven and restored. The final step in this violence against their wives is putting them away, divorcing them. Here is real treachery. 19. Relevance. She was the wife of his youth, the one who had his first affections when they were the strongest, the one who probably gave him children, the one who had lived through it all with him. You did misread, but it could have been my wording. They had been told by the prophet that God was rejecting their worship; but their response was not fear and repentance. The prophet gave no details, only a description of this as a treachery--to God and the covenant as well as to the wives. And we find no better description of this violation and its pain than in the Bible than in Malachi 2. But now, these women were being cast aside as an old garment for something new and fresh and exciting, but thoroughly pagan. Best to trust in dogma in this case. bulltaker. They cannot get validly married in that scenario, for although they technically administer the sacrament to one another, a priest and witnesses must be present. The fact that God was witness tells us that marriage is a covenant, whether there was a ceremony or not. ... We went to marriage counseling and it helped a lot. need a rhetorical question supporting gay marriage, please help or "what makes you you?" Judgment for this kind of sin applied to everyone, rich or poor, leader or follower. Rhetorical questions are also sometimes called erotema. It was an integral ingredient in the happiness of Eden, and so is an integral part of society. So I was wondering about something. Malachi was not yet through. The first thing we note is the identity of the guilty. Brady uses pathos in her stylish language. RHETORICAL QUESTION AND THEIR ANSWERS IN ROMANS RHETORICAL QUESTION: “What shall we say then? One very possible interpretation would be to say the waker and answerer refer to watchmen in the city. What do you think of the answers? Rhetorical questions can be used to make a point; they’re asked without an expectation of a reply. Some may find that it is too late, because they have lived through a failed marriage and there is no going back. In the Jewish writings the verb came to mean “act violently, faithlessly, and rebel.” So the people had been unfaithful to God, traitors to the covenant. Unfortunately, after the … A rhetorical question about gay marriage maybe, "why do some still oppose gay marriage?" So I was wondering about something. John W. Lv 6. The two would have to be committed to the faith and to the training of children in it. It creates havoc with the society, violates the family, and spoils the covenant God loves. The message brought a clear rebuke from the prophet because a violation of the covenant has been committed. Now she had become the scorn and loathing of his later years. It is a life term commitment before God to stay together. Oh, it is regarded as a tragedy, certainly a stressful experience, and a failure on some level. If a person competent to assist according to the norm of law cannot be present or approached without grave inconvenience, those who intend to enter into a true marriage can contract it validly and licitly before witnesses only: 2/ outside the danger of death provided that it is prudently foreseen that the situation will continue for a month. To motivate diligence and care for the marriage, Malachi has included three warnings: 1) divorce and remarriage (especially to a pagan) destroys worship; 2) divorce and remarriage (especially to a pagan) hinders producing godly children; and 3) God hates divorce. These heightened the boldness of the sin--it was no marginal problem of people who had no biblical training; it was in the very center of the political and religious community. These are figures of speech (metonymies of subject, meaning the people in these areas). Nowhere do I have a teaching that presumes He Himself would serve as that witness in a post-Eden world. Catholic canon law provides for an extraordinary form of marriage for those without access to a pastor or other person authorized to witness a Catholic marriage: Can. . The objective is to find a person you can grow old with, build a life with. The reason that God loathed it was that it “defiled the holiness” of God that he loves. 1 0. 14:2). Several passages use covenant language for marriage: Proverbs 2:17; Ezekiel 16:7 (applying it to God and the nation); Ruth 4:11 (witnessed by the community) and Genesis 24:60 (based on love and faithfulness). But the word “holiness” may refer to the nation itself. She makes her audience think of the need for marriage. CompSciGuy June 22, 2011, 1:58pm #1. The answer to the peoples’ question was a stinging answer from the prophet. How do same sex marriages prophogate the speciers? Her narration evokes feelings based on her reasoning towards marriage. She makes her audience think of the need for marriage. 32:18; Isa. A rhetorical question may be used for an already asked question as a metaphor. But the human race embraced every form of profane and vile activity; and within the marriage relationship the laws of God were broken at every turn. The covenant agreement of a marriage is to be based on loyal love, characterized by the protection and care of the partners, and dedicated to producing righteous, believing children that God may provide. In the modern world the dissolution of a marriage is rarely considered a sin; rather, it is an option that may be taken to avoid difficulties or tensions. 4 d. NO under no circumstances, what if they didn't like sex? 7 years ago. God established the marriage laws (Lev. Perhaps rephrase the question. The apostles caught the idea of their master, and invested it with mystic solemnity by presenting it as a type of the substantial, invisible and everlasting union existing between Christ and his bride, the church. Second, the immediate context is based on the fact that God made them one nation. In the earlier days when people heard the Word of the LORD they trembled and listened; but in Malachi’s day when they heard the Word they challenged it. Malachi says, “May the LORD cut off … .” This is not an announcement of doom; it is an imprecation of the prophet as if to say the people deserve this judgment. Hence, both parties need to … That is what their hand produced, as Malachi put it. The line is powerful: “I hate putting away.” Some of the ancient versions actually misinterpreted the line to say, “if a man hates his wife he should put her away.” But the context is against divorce, and an exception as wide as this would not fit. Answer Save. The usage of this sardonic punctuation mark faded during the 17th century. Pagan intermarriage and the dissolution of good marriages would ruin the chance to do this. Of course you wouldn't." What did Malachi mean by “the holiness” of the Lord? As we shall see in these first three verses Malachi was actually condemning intermarriage with pagans; and these intermarriages gave the occasion for the divorces. “Defile” means “common, profane, separated from the sanctuary” or from God. The outward sign of dedication to the LORD was betrayed by the treachery of uniting with paganism in marriage. Argument Analysis on Gay Marriage There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” Romans 6:2 RHETORICAL QUESTION: “Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them […] - i swear someone just asked that question on yahoo a … 1116 §1. Third, Malachi begins his book on the fact that God loves Israel. She was not a servant or a slave; she was a partner. Hence, it is a very difficult situation to explore. Alerts caregiver when patient stop using the Fall Alert app. However, the greatest question is why she wanted to have a wife. He is the author of Introducing Biblical Hebrew and Grammar, Holiness to the Lord: A Guide to the Exposition of the Book of Leviticus, Creation and Blessing: A Guide to the Study and Exposit... More, 1. Sorry to detract from the thread, but unless I am misreading what you wrote or intended to convey, it seems odd to say that an omniscient God might not understand something, including a person’s intentions. Accordingly, it involves the most tender, close, and lasting ties that can unite human beings together in this life. Malachi begins by laying down a principle: although Israel was created by one Father, they were guilty of treachery against the covenant. A rhetorical analysis of the essay can provide an effective understanding of Brady’s mind in narration. And in the days of the prophets, a Malachi was there to declare the standard. 34:11 and Deut. But what this prophet faced was an antagonistic audience, much like today in these matters. The support for this view is a little more convincing. It is a way of adding style to your essay.. Gay marriage will not renew marriage’s central public role because committed, loving gays and lesbians intend to abide by the same principles on which the institution of marriage … Leah: The Woman No Man Loved But Every Woman Envied (Gen. 29:15-35), 1. Of course you wouldn't." The answer, through some poetic expressions, indicates that none are excluded. However, we form scars more quickly in a marriage. 13:29) for the people he loved (=chose) in order that they might be distinct to him. 3 Answers. It is clear that the intermarriage of Israelites with pagans was repugnant to God; and it should have then been a matter of reverential dread to the people as well. Marriage is not a piece of paper, wedding, or ring. Now, however, Israel had profaned that holiness and made themselves common. Xper 1. Malachi delivered his burden to the people of Israel well after the time of the return and revivals of Ezra and Nehemiah, somewhere between 440 and 400 B.C. Pride and Prejudice is famous for its use of irony.In irony, the intended or literal meaning of words is different from their actual meaning. Jesus threw a distinct holiness and grandeur around this particular relationship of a man and a woman. It combines the earthly interest, fortunes, and happiness of two people, a man and a woman, and it influences the destiny of many others. He first sympathizes with the poor people in Ireland and makes himself appear sensitive and empathetic. In marriages there will be fallings from the ideal for sure; the marriage may be strained and thinned by friction, or marred and spoiled by a gross contempt for its moral meaning; but the failures and abuse do not destroy or degrade the ideal. Rhetorical question: Marriage. Marrying an idolatrous woman was one thing; but dumping a legitimate wife for her is another. He takes them back to the marriage of their youth, a marriage covenant that God himself witnessed, and so one signed and sealed in heaven. For example, he says, the “mothers instead of being able to work for their honest livelihood, are forced to employ all their time in strolling to beg sustenance for their helpless infants” (Swift, 831). She was not only the wife of his youth, but his comrade, his partner. 2. In one sense, your hypothetical is somewhat irrational. So the next time you have a spare minute, ask them one of these fun questions for married couples – covering their childhood years, teens years and random imaginings. Perhaps with the reference to the “tents” we can get the idea of watchmen at either end of the camp, one calling out and the other answering. Ultimately, it is about your happiness. It was all unfaithfulness to God, for sin against another person was sin against God. But more to the point, because loyalty to the covenant was paramount, the Law strictly prohibited intermarriage with the pagans (see Exod. Their personal blessing depended on preserving this covenant; and the well-being of the nation depended on the marriages doing what they were supposed to do. The term is bagad (bah-gad), related to beged (“garment”). Did they not learn from their history and their exile? A powerful teaching aid, rhetorical questions are often used in the Bible. This kind of gift was not usually a blood sacrifice, but a gift of foods and produce. Ultimately, it is about your happiness. This view has the support of the book that presents the nation as the creation of God. To do this, then, was to dishonor God and act faithlessly against fellow members of the covenant. It seems that no one can come to a common agreement on the legitimacy of these topics. All of these qualifications of marriage were piled up by the prophet to enforce how treacherous this all was. Their woe rose to God with such intensity that God no longer could regard (give attention to) the offerings brought by the men. IF two people were in fact cut off from civilization, God would be working out many things with them outside of His sacraments, and would judge them on the knowledge they had, and lacked through no fault of their own. A rhetorical analysis of the essay can provide an effective understanding of Brady’s mind in narration. The final section is clearly set off as a warning for those who are in a marriage. the rhetorical question should be about if we are born with our identity or not. Everything You Should Know About Using Rhetorical Questions in … Perhaps a better view is that the “one” refers to the nation of Israel, the covenant people. First, Israel is called a holy nation (Deut. Whatever was there that fit the description of “holy matrimony” had now become nothing more than a “common coupling” or “profane fornication.”. They, of course, might choose to take their chances and rely on God understanding their predicament and intentions, but His work outside of the sacraments is a mystery, while His work within the sacraments is dogma.

Does Woods Die In Black Ops 2, Sony Ht-g700 Uk, Shirt Design Maker, How To Cook Turtle Meat, Uncle Max Lion King, Mi Body Composition Scale Multiple Users, Best Countertop Oven Uk,

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *